Woodstock Accounting Firm 770-591-8505

Tax News

IRS Warning on ERC Claims

The Internal Revenue Service today issued a renewed warning urging people to carefully review the Employee Retention Credit (ERC) guidelines before trying to claim the credit as promoters continue pushing ineligible people to file.

The IRS and tax professionals continue to see third parties aggressively promoting these ERC schemes on radio and online. These promoters charge large upfront fees or a fee that is contingent on the amount of the refund. And the promoters may not inform taxpayers that wage deductions claimed on the business' federal income tax return must be reduced by the amount of the credit.

"While this is a legitimate credit that has provided a financial lifeline to millions of businesses, there continue to be promoters who aggressively mislead people and businesses into thinking they can claim these credits," said Acting IRS Commissioner Doug O'Donnell. "Anyone who is considering claiming this credit needs to carefully review the guidelines. If the tax professional they're using raises questions about the accuracy of the Employee Retention Credit claim, people should listen to their advice. The IRS is actively auditing and conducting criminal investigations related to these false claims. People need to think twice before claiming this."

The IRS has been warning about this scheme since last fall, but there continue to be attempts to claim the ERC during the 2023 tax filing season. Tax professionals note they continue to be pressured by people wanting to claim credits improperly. The IRS Office of Professional Responsibility is working on additional guidance for the tax professional community that will be available in the near future.

People and businesses can avoid this scheme, and by not filing improper claims in the first place. If the business filed an income tax return deducting qualified wages before it filed an employment tax return claiming the credit, the business should file an amended income tax return to correct any overstated wage deduction.

Businesses should be cautious of advertised schemes and direct solicitations promising tax savings that are too good to be true. Taxpayers are always responsible for the information reported on their tax returns. Improperly claiming the ERC could result in taxpayers being required to repay the credit along with penalties and interest.

Crypto Donated to Charity - Dont Do it!!!

Crypto Donated to Charity

Issue – Is a qualified appraisal required for a charitable contribution of cryptocurrency?

Chief Counsel Memorandum (CCM) 202302012 presents and answers this question, with a “Yes”.  Here is the CCM’s reasoning:

FACTS presented in the CCM:  Taxpayer A is an individual who purchases units of Cryptocurrency B for personal investment purposes.  Taxpayer A later transferred all of her units to a charitable organization.  On her self-prepared Federal tax return, she claimed a $10,000 deduction. The amount was based on a value listed on the cryptocurrency exchange at the date and time of the donation.  Taxpayer A did not attempt to obtain an qualified appraisal to support the deduction.

IRS RESPONSE - Notice 2014-21 describes cryptocurrency as “property” and that general tax principles applicable to property apply to cryptocurrency.  A deduction for a charitable donation of property of more than $5,000 requires a qualified appraisal according to IRC section 170(f)(11)(C).

Regulation 1.170A-16(d)(2)(i) gives an exception to this “qualified appraisal” requirement for donations of certain readily valued property specifically set forth in the Code and regulations.  The property “specifically set forth” are:  cash, stock in trade, inventory, property primarily held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, publicly traded securities, intellectual property, and certain vehicles.  The CCM states cryptocurrency is not included in this list of items, therefore, does not meet this exception.

IRC section 170(f)(11)(A)(ii)(II) provides that failure to meet these appraisal requirements will not result in denial of the deduction if it is shown that the failure to meet the requirements is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect.

RESULTS - Taxpayer A was denied the deduction because:

1) Taxpayer A did not obtain a qualified appraisal and the property was not one of the “specifically set forth” items.

2) Taxpayer A did not have reasonable cause for failing to obtain the appraisal.

GA Amends Unemployment Compensation For Scope Of Employment

On May 2, 2022, Governor Brian Kemp signed a bill providing detailed guidance for Georgia employers regarding how to classify employees vs. independent contractors for purposes of contributions to unemployment. Specifically, HB 389 amends the definition of employment, stating that unless an exception applies, services performed by an individual for wages are deemed employment unless the individual is free from control or direction over performance of such services. The amendment provides the following factors for determining whether an individual is free from control or direction and whether the individual:

  • Is not prohibited from working for other companies or holding other employment contemporaneously;
  • Has the discretion to set their own work schedule;
  • Is free to accept or reject work assignments without consequence;
  • Is not prescribed minimum hours to work or, in the case of sales, does not have a minimum number of orders to be obtained;
  • Receives only minimum instructions and no direct oversight or supervision regarding the services to be performed, such as the location where the services are to be performed and any requested deadlines;
  • When applicable, has no territorial or geographic restrictions;
  • Is not required to perform, behave, or act or, alternatively, is compelled to perform, behave, or act in a manner related to the performance of services for wages which is determined by the Commissioner of Labor to demonstrate employment; and
  • Is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business.

It is unclear whether all of the above-listed factors must be met in order for the individual to be considered an independent contractor, or whether the factors should be weighed in a balancing test. 

HB 389 also adds two exceptions to the definition of employment. First exempted from the definition are music industry professionals who provide services under a contract as long as that contract meets certain requirements. Additionally, to fit within the exception, the music industry professional must regularly exercise discretion and independent judgment in the performance of the services provided for in the contract.

The second exception relates to services performed or facilitated through a “network company” (defined as a rideshare network service or a business entity that maintains an online-enabled application or platform used to facilitate delivery services in Georgia). The exception applies when the network company has a written contract with the service provider that expressly provides that the network company shall not:

  • Unilaterally prescribe specific dates, times of day, or a minimum number of hours during which a service provider must be logged in to the application or platform;
  • Terminate such contract if the service provider does not accept, or require the service provider to accept, any specific transportation or delivery service request, although the company can require the service provider to accept a certain percentage of requests;
  • Restrict the service provider from performing the same services through other network companies, except at the same time; and
  • Restrict the service provider from working in any other lawful occupation or business.

Companies who misclassify employees as independent contractors, and therefore are not contributing to unemployment for those individuals, may receive a fine for such misclassification ranging from up to $2,500 (if the employer has under 100 employees) to $7,500 (if the employer has 100 or more employees) for each misclassified individual.

Classification of independent contractors is an important issue that can have consequences for employers under numerous laws and regulations, including under federal wage laws, tax laws, and, as here, state unemployment law. Although HB 389 is limited to the Georgia unemployment context and is generally consistent with other applicable standards, it is important for employers to be aware of this issue broadly and to ensure all workers are properly classified. As a practical matter, if an individual meets the definition of employee under any applicable legal standard, that person must be classified as an employee for all purposes. In addition, while consistent with the factors Georgia courts have previously considered when determining whether an individual is properly classified, HB 389 is notable as the Georgia legislature has now enumerated specific factors with respect to the control or direction inquiry.

Overall, the companies who are likely to feel the biggest impact from HB 389 are technology companies that meet the definition of a “network company” and engage workers in Georgia (for example, ride share or other delivery services). These companies may consider this exception a positive development for the industry, albeit in a relatively limited area. However, to benefit from the exception described above, such companies need to ensure any contracts and relationships they have with independent contractors in Georgia comply with the requirements of HB 389.

HB 389 took effect on July 1, 2022.

Revised RMD Start Dates

The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 is Division T of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 (Public Law 117-183), signed by President Biden on December 29, 2022.

DELAY IN RMD STARTING DATE (Act section 107) - The new RMD starting date is:

A.  Age 73 for anyone who is attains age 72 AFTER December 31, 2022 and attains age 73 BEFORE January 1, 2033.  (This means anyone who is turning 72 during 2023 and was anticipating having to start their RMDs for 2023, will have one more year before they have to start.)

B.  Age 75 for anyone who attains age 74 AFTER December 31, 2032.

 

Standard Mileage Rate Changes July 1 2022

The IRS has changed the mileage rate midyear as a reaction to the spiking cost of fuel.  Be prepared to give us the mileage in each of the (2) periods listed below when we are preparing the tax returns.

 

The rates for travel from January 1-June 30, 2022 are:

- Business rate is 58.5 cents per mile (up from 56 for 2021).  The depreciation portion of this rate is 26 cents per mile (same as for 2021).

- Charitable rate is 14 cents per mile (same as for 2021).

- Medical and moving rate is 18 cents per mile (up from 16 for 2021).

 

The rates for travel on or after July 1, 2022 are::

- Business rate is 62.5 cents per mile.  The depreciation portion of this rate is still 26 cents per mile.

- Charitable rate is 14 cents per mile.

- Medical and moving rate is 22 cents per mile.